Another Strickland UK

Salut Atthis, are you in France? (Not in Canada)
 
Last edited:
I ask because an ancestor of mine made a tour of Brittany, in 1888, on a tricycle tandem, with her new husband. They started in Caen and reached the south of Brittany when a wheel collapsed. No one could fix it, so they finished the tour by train. It was a time of great experimentation, particularly in tandems, so I am looking for a photo.

She left a journal, so I know photos were taken. I have enquired at local archives but no luck. Do you know if anyone has copies of local papers from the time? Or is there a French vintage cycle club, which might help?

Thanks, Charlie.
 
what was the journal to drive research

It appears to be from page 184 in the document at the first link below. Strickland was also listed in the official directory of the World's Columbian exposition, May 1st to October 30th, 1893. This is available at the second link below.

Benson



 
Hello Athis,

I got the year wrong, it was the second half of May, 1885. They started in Cherbourg, Valognes, Coutances then Granville, where there was definitely a photo. Avranches, Pontorson, Dinan, Ploermel and the wheel collapsed in Vannes.

She was called Fanny and her husband George Brayshay.

I think we had better move to ffison (at) tiscali (dot) co (dot) uk. I have started with gallica.

Many thanks.
 
I finished the ribs and moved on to the inwales, quite complicated pieces of woodwork, let alone the steaming, so I have reused the originals.

The original screws holding them to the strips and outwales were mild steel, so had rusted. I had to use a hollow drill to release the shanks from the wood, so the inwales were quite heavily perforated. To strengthen them, and perhaps keep moisture and bugs out, I glued 1" dowels in. I then had to mark where new brass screws could go, avoiding the dowels, the rusted remains of the original screws
IMG_4346.jpg
IMG_4347.jpg
IMG_4349.jpg
the ribs and the holes where the screws holding the coaming will go, at approx 4" centres.

It seems inwales and coamings are unusual on a Strickland, so I've drawn a rough of the construction and a couple of photos of the well-worn originals. The inwale has to be relieved underneath to clear the ribs. The original ribs were consistently 3/8" half-round, ie 3/16" thick. The ones I had a local firm machine from rock elm planks are not so consistent, so they needed work for the inwale to fit.
 
I believe that canoes were shipped without thwarts and decks in place so they could be nested. Each canoes parts were numbered to ease reassembly at their destination. I wonder if the other deck and other original parts have this identifying feature?

Sam
 
I had a look under the thwarts and they both had this, not yet useful.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4357.jpg
    IMG_4357.jpg
    45.6 KB · Views: 31
I've turned the canoe over and started scraping the outside. With good old hindsight, I can suggest that anyone intending to replace ribs AND scrape the outside, do the scraping first.

I don't know if the ribs and nails were first fitted while the strips were still damp from steaming, but the nailheads had sunk into the strips. Of the 900-odd nails I have replaced, maybe 5% were still proud, probably because, when cutting the ends and turning them over, there is a risk the hammering will drive the nail back a little. This makes the scraping more difficult.

In the photo you can see the new nails, the old ones, the scraped paint and a bit of unscraped.

I was hoping the outside had been varnished and then painted but it seems the black paint was applied under the waterline first and then the rest varnished. The black has soaked into the wood and I don't think it's worth trying to remove it. Besides, the paint seems almost like it has been heated, in places it is very thick and almost crystalline. The varnish comes off comparatively easily.

There are many bumps and gouges - it has had an active life.

IMG_4358.jpg
 
I finally had a go at the crystalline paint with a heat gun. It smelt of tar and bubbled, some remailing in the cracks but it came off fairly easily. I asked Mark Edwards and they use Bostik bituminous black paint, made for waterproofing outside surfaces such as roofs.

I'll mask the water line and bash those pesky nailheads again before using that.

Thinking about those nails, perhaps it would be better, after knocking them through and before cutting, to bend them 45 degrees and establish the bend before cutting and finishing off. That way there might be less chance of the nailheads being driven back.
 
I was hoping the outside had been varnished and then painted but it seems the black paint was applied under the waterline first and then the rest varnished. The black has soaked into the wood and I don't think it's worth trying to remove it. Besides, the paint seems almost like it has been heated, in places it is very thick and almost crystalline. The varnish comes off comparatively easily.

crystalline ? maybe shou sugi ban ?

 
Yeees, that would certainly set the traditionalists alight. I think I'll leave that to you. Meanwhile, I scrape, scrape, scrape...
 
IMG_4368.jpg


I'm amazed how white the cedar is, after all these years. I've been using a 1" chisel with the end heated with oxy-acetylene and bent 90 degrees. I sharpen it about every 4 sq. ft. A friend who is restoring a Thames skiff (clinker-built leisure rowing boat) uses heat and paint stripper but I think I prefer scraping. It may be slower but it's cleaner, dryer and I think gives a better finish.

The raised nail heads are still a pain and sometimes the grain in the wood seems to run neither way. What is particularly annoying is the use of mild steel screws, the rust stains the wood heavily and when I unscrew them, the rusted shank breaks, which means a new hole. I suppose. long ago, when materials were expensive and labour cheap, saving a few pence made sense.
 
What is particularly annoying is the use of mild steel screws, the rust stains the wood heavily and when I unscrew them, the rusted shank breaks, which means a new hole. I suppose. long ago, when materials were expensive and labour cheap, saving a few pence made sense.
Charlie, I once made the same complaint (perhaps a bit stronger!) and a WCHA member said, "you know, the builder never expected this canoe to last 100+ years and that you would be restoring it today". Fair enough. I see the point and I no longer complain about iron fasteners!
 
Yes, I suppose so but most of the fastenings are copper or brass. I suspect a later reworking, using what was to hand.

The chap helping me, who did a (full size) wooden boat apprenticeship 60 years ago, said that one of their early jobs was to burn old boats, then rake through the ashes to reclaim the fastenings.
 
I bought three tools in three size like this 25 years ago and many blades for the oak stairs and floor, like this , but single blade in U as same but this one you put two blade on the handle, double time an other double time whith reverse in use before sanding ... the mine where from US in our great tools and material seller


so a blue steel spring keep from an industrial curtain , cutted , bended drilled forged and fixed on an handle is the poorman best tool for us
 
Last edited:
Yours seems a better tool for flat surfaces, but a canoe is mostly curves and more delicate than an oak floor.

Scraping is a surprisingly forceful activity but, at the same time you need to be ready to stop before digging in. Easier said than done.

I tried a cheap plastic scraper but it was useless, whatever tool you use needs to be strong.

For the inside of the canoe, your tool, Athis, would have been good for the ribs, but between the ribs I needed a curved blade, regularly sharpened and given a burr (a sharp lip).
 
Back
Top