To point out the obvious, no one has suggested tossing the canoe in the burn pile and no one has suggested the canoe should not be restored. What has been noticed and pointed out is that the shear plank gores are oddly done and also that the builder "landed" the joints on the same rib. That is generally regarded as inappropriate. The canoe has survived in spite of those apparent flaws so maybe that is a non-issue?
What has further been revealed by discussing this is that these characteristics have shown themselves on other Charles river canoes built in that period.
So, from where I sit, this is an interesting discussion that has resulted in (at least for me) a new awareness of this technique.
I have no doubt that it will be nicely restored by Dan, and well worth whatever effort it takes.