New to me, 16 foot Chestnut canoe.

fernieite

Curious about Wooden Canoes
Hi all,

I just joined the forum to try to get some information on a 16 foot Chestnut that I just bought. Does anyone know what model this would be, or the approximate year of manufacturing?

There are no logos remaining since the boat was restored about 24 years ago. However, I have a copy of the work invoice, and the restorer, Roger Foster (Carlisle Canoes) calls the boat a 16' Chestnut.

Here's the work he did in June of 2000: "General repairs to 16 ft Chestnut canoe, including new inwales, new outwales, 9 ribs, 43 feet planking, new keel and decks, canvas."

d180e96f-c1de-4a02-97e8-2e09529ef18a.webp
c5868e4b-218c-48e7-9b94-6e9a3186ad1c.webp
5430d9da-b858-4f02-9ca1-5bb79d5ad109.webp
 
Last edited:
Here are the measurements I just took:

15' 10" length, end to end.
35 1/4" beam at centre thwart.
13 3/4" deep from top of rib to top of gunwales. (Using a broom handle for a straight edge on top of the gunwales at centre thwart)
1 1/2" ribs (3/8" thick) 1 1/2" space in between.
3" planks.
Approximately 75 lbs.

Let me know if you'd like anymore measurements or photos.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
It also has a serial or model number, but it's not very legible at this point. Maybe some day I'll clean it up, or strip the varnish off in order to read the numbers properly. (Sorry, a couple of the photos are upside-down!)

20241024_141908.jpg
20241024_140929.jpg
20241024_140917.jpg
 
Last edited:
Hi and welcome. You've found the best possible place to get any info you're looking for.
Although no expert I own three Chestnut canoes, a chum, pal, and prospector. Although only the chum is restored at this point.
I'd say your canoe looks like my pal? It's definitely post fire by the shape of the decks and the dimensions you've given similar to the pal.
Enjoy it they are great to paddle.
Gary
 
It's definitely post fire by the shape of the decks and the dimensions you've given similar to the pal.
Enjoy it they are great to paddle.
Gary
Don't be misled about dating Chestnuts by deck shape. This is my 1913 ish Teddy

PXL_20230302_160857001.jpg

Lovely looking canoe though, whatever the age!

Sam
 
Thanks for all the comments, gents!

Is it possible that Chestnuts were made somewhat loosely based on their catalogue measurements?

If this is a Pal, like @Gary proposed; my canoe's length is 2" short of the 16 foot catalogue's specification, in-between the 34" or 36" of the catalogue's beam spec, (depending on the year) and deeper than the catalogue's 12" or 12 3/4" depth spec. (Again, depending on the year)
(Assuming, I took my measurements correctly)
 
Last edited:
Also, according to the catalogues; the Pal changed to 2 3/8" ribs by 1972. The 1964 catalogue still shows them as being 1 1/2", like mine.

Another alternative - By 1972, (Until 1977) the old 1 1/2" ribbed "Pal" was renamed the Deer...
 
Last edited:
Skinny ribs were introduced to Peterborough, Chestnut and Canadian in 1939 and they alternated back and forth regularly. Looks like a Cedarwood or other that built on Chestnut forms, the bottom is excessively rounded which they tended to do, making them more tender than originals built by the factory.
 
How would Cedarwood have made the bottom more rounded? Did they modify the original chestnut forms?
 
Not enough soaking or steam, too quick off the form, etc will see significant springback, same as stems. Many of their canoes i've seen are quite rounded. Shortening thwarts can produce this effect, however its not normally desirable in terms of performance.
 
Aha, that's interesting!
A friend of mine has a Cedarwood Prospector 16' with a very round bottom. Now I wonder if the original Chestnut would be less rounded.
Probably I'll never know for sure, because I don't know of any Chestnut Prospector here in Germany...
 
You would find originals much less rounded. I restored a 16' a few years back, you can see that it and the chum next to it are fairly flat bottomed.
 

Attachments

  • 1730236034084.png
    1730236034084.png
    109.1 KB · Views: 38
  • 1730236017073.png
    1730236017073.png
    188.9 KB · Views: 42
Fwiw, here are a few more photos of mine. (These were taken a few days ago before I gave it a good cleaning) Of course, camera angles can sometimes make things appear a bit distorted or inaccurate...

20241025_140217.jpg
20241024_141545.jpg
20241024_141111.jpg
20241024_141057.jpg
20241024_140851.jpg
20241024_140842.jpg
20241024_140825.jpg
20241024_140802.jpg
20241024_140749.jpg
 
Last edited:
As mentioned in an earlier post, Roger Foster (Carlisle Canoes) restored it 24 years ago. He replaced the gunwales and decks, some ribs and planking and canvas.

It was all original before he worked on it, and he identified it as a 16' Chestnut.
Here's what the invoice detailed:

"General repairs to 16 ft Chestnut canoe, including new inwales, new outwales, 9 ribs, 43 feet planking, new keel and decks, canvas."
 
Last edited:
Ferniete!

Weighing in late to this discussion.
First off- very nice looking canoe! Hope you can get it out for a paddle still this season!

I'm going to agree with Gary- Hi Gary!- this looks an awful lot like a chestnut Pal, my Pal in particular.
Mine is a late 50's-early 60's vintage boat that had decks, outwales and 6 ribs replaced about 10 years ago.
Dimension wise it is very similar to yours, too- same ribs width and spacing, depth is 14" and beam measures 34 1/4" . The length of my pal is shorter than yours at 15' 8" .
It isn't entirely clear from your photos but it appears there is no taper in the ribs? This would be a narrowing of the rib tops over the last number of inches before meeting the inwale. Mine doesn't have tapered ribs either and it was pointed out that this may allow factory identification. Chestnut used tapered ribs in the York Street factory in Fredericton, whereas the Peterborough Canoe Co. on King Street in Peterborough did not. Accordingly, the curator of the Canoe Museum tagged my boat a "Peternut"- a Chestnut decaled boat constructed on Chestnut forms in Peterborough.

Hope that helps- and welcome to the forum!
Bruce
 

Attachments

  • 016.JPG
    016.JPG
    252.1 KB · Views: 23
Ferniete!

Weighing in late to this discussion.
First off- very nice looking canoe! Hope you can get it out for a paddle still this season!

I'm going to agree with Gary- Hi Gary!- this looks an awful lot like a chestnut Pal, my Pal in particular.
Mine is a late 50's-early 60's vintage boat that had decks, outwales and 6 ribs replaced about 10 years ago.
Dimension wise it is very similar to yours, too- same ribs width and spacing, depth is 14" and beam measures 34 1/4" . The length of my pal is shorter than yours at 15' 8" .
It isn't entirely clear from your photos but it appears there is no taper in the ribs? This would be a narrowing of the rib tops over the last number of inches before meeting the inwale. Mine doesn't have tapered ribs either and it was pointed out that this may allow factory identification. Chestnut used tapered ribs in the York Street factory in Fredericton, whereas the Peterborough Canoe Co. on King Street in Peterborough did not. Accordingly, the curator of the Canoe Museum tagged my boat a "Peternut"- a Chestnut decaled boat constructed on Chestnut forms in Peterborough.

Hope that helps- and welcome to the forum!
Bruce
Hi Bruce,

Thanks for the info! (And the welcome) That's an interesting theory. I had searched for information about Peterborough built Chestnuts a while ago, but didn't come up with much.

You may be right about mine. The ribs don't seem to taper. Here are a couple of photos that I just took. Do they show up well enough?

By the way, the guy I bought it from who lives in Waterloo, bought it from the original owner, a lady from Peterborough! (about 25 or 30 years ago)

Beauty Peternut, man!

Thanks a lot. Sean.

20241030_131348.jpg
20241030_131400.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top