Todd Bradshaw
Sailmaker
In that case, check 1973, because I'm probably in there.
Someone please educate me. I always thought primary stability was how stable my canoe felt while we were sitting in the water before getting underway, (when most canoes accidents happen, while getting in & out), and secondary stability was how stable it became or felt while underway.
Dan Miller said:I feel like I'm walking into Monty Python's Argument Shop....
Looking through Adney and Chappelle, I see a number of recorded designs that, to my eye, appear to have design qualities that suggest greater secondary stability. One could easily check this by getting the offsets from lines drawings, entering them into a boat design program like FreeShip!, and generating Cross Curves of Stability. One could compare it with designs of known (or familiar) stability as a reference points. See John Winter's book "The Shape of the Canoe" for more information.
That said, I'll offer up http://web.mac.com/beaverbarkcanoes/iWeb/Beaver Bark Canoes/Beaver Bark Canoes.html and http://www.beaversss.blogspot.com/ . Ferdy, who happens to be a member here and who I hope will chime in, shows several examples of canoes that look to me to have strong secondary stability characters. Ferdy is not the only currently active builder, but he is certainly among the best.
I'll also toss out that Tom Mackenzie (one of WCHA's finest builder of solo freestyle canoes) and David Yost (designer for Bell, Wenonah, and quite conversant in solo freestyle paddling) built a bark canoe on one of the solo canoe molds that DY designed (maybe MY BUG - memory fails here).
So, it can be done. Your problem is hooking up with the fellow who can do it for you ...
Todd,, I do commision work and special orders so let me know when you are ready for one. FerdyTodd Bradshaw said:I've always wondered just how much of the crooked canoe's design was for function and how much was some sort of regional or tribal cosmetic building style. Having owned a whole herd of whitewater slalom canoes and kayaks over the years, C-2's, C-1's and K-1's, decked and open, some built to racing rules and others just playboats, I can't see any practical reason for that much rocker. With one-third of the amount shown on most crooked canoes, you can have a boat that will spin 180 degrees or more with a single stroke of the paddle and stop spinning almost instantly when you stick the paddle back in. Raising the ends higher than that, when they're already out of the water, doesn't seem to do much other than catch more wind. I used a little Mad River Royalex play boat for a while with something like six or eight inches of rocker. It would climb over just about any wave and spin on a dime. Increasing the rocker on the ends even more wouldn't have made it a better boat or added anything to the package.
I suppose if you were used to paddling bull boats (round, kind of like a coracle) a crooked canoe might seem like an improvement, but finding a practical use or need for them pretty much stumps me. I also wondered if some Native Americans were just better boat designers than others. Perhaps every culture has it's own Coleman Canoe... or Dolphin Chief.
If Ferdy would get busy and build one, I'm up that way all the time and could maybe satisfy my curiosity......hint, hint.