Early canvas canoe information

Rethinking the History Maine Canvas Canoes

The idea that some early Maine builders, such as Gerrish, began their careers by simply substituting canvas for bark is not new, but up until recently we didn’t know much of anything about them, so many assumed that they were likely a brief and somewhat crude interlude between the bark and wood-canvas canoes, and that the latter emerged soon after Gerrish started building canvas canoes in 1875. But now it seems likely that Gerrish was building them for at least twelve years (1875-1877), because according to Morris all the early Maine canvas canoes were built “after the principle of the birch-bark canoes, of loose ribs and planking with a tight skin of canvas” until he adopted the "method of the solid planked shell […], which instead of putting the woodwork into the canvas, caused the canvas to be drawn over the solid planked shell” at his first factory in 1887. Although it is unclear whether or not Morris initially used canoe forms to build these shells, I think this event is presently our best candidate for the beginning of the Maine wood-canvas canoe. Although Gerrish and Morris quickly moved on to the wood-canvas canoes, some indigenous communities in Eastern Canada would continue building the original Maine canvas canoes until the middle of the twentieth century. So the original Maine canvas canoes should be considered a distinct and unique canoe building tradition that began in Maine with Gerrish and was quickly adopted by both non-indigenous and indigenous builders. Most non-indigenous builders turned to the wood-canvas canoe during the final two years of the 1880s, while among indigenous builders, it spread regionally and was used by some communities into the mid-twentieth century.

Descriptions indicate that the quality of materials and construction of these canoes was anything but crude. Gerrish tells us in 1882 that the lumber he used “[was] of the very best quality, knots and sap being inadmissible in canoe building,” and “the strength of the combination of frail materials [was] wonderful.” He also argued among other things that “canvas covering admits of far more graceful outline than the birch, especially at the ends, where the latter is generally lumpy and unsightly with liberal applications of pitch.” The canvas canoe Gerrish sent to the New Orleans Exposition in late 1884 was described as follows.

1884_Gerrish_Canoe_New_Orleans_Exposition.png

Other examples include two Gerrish canvas canoes displayed at the New England Fair in 1885.
1885_Gerrish_BDWC_New England Fair_Sept 5.png


Kirkpatrick canvas canoes from 1885,
1885_Piscatquis, Bangor Daily Whig and Courier.png
and two Morris canvas canoes displayed at Bangor in 1886.
1886_NPAR_BangorDailyWhigandCourier_1886_Mayll_p3_Vol53Issue111_GalePrimarySources.png

[I will post some photos of original Maine canvas canoes in a separate post, which also suggest that some Maine builders had mastered this building technique and were producing high quality canoes that were in general appearance indistinguishable from the later wood-canvas canoes.]

These original Maine canvas canoe set the stage for the wood-canvas canoe by normalizing the use of canvas in Maine canoe building, and ultimately displacing the “Birch” as the pre-eminent canoe in the Maine tourist industry. In other words, it was the original Maine canvas canoe, not the wood-canvas canoe, that successfully transformed the traditional birch bark building tradition into a nascent canvas canoe building tradition in Maine. This transition took more than a decade, but as the superior durability of canvas became more widely understood, and the supply of suitable bark diminished the original canvas canoe ultimately prevailed. During the 1880s descriptions of Moosehead Lake, the epicenter of the Maine tourist industry, reveal the continuous encroachment of canvas canoes. Farrar’s famous Illustrated Guide of Moosehead Lake was recommending canvas canoes for “rough work” by 1880.

1880_Farrar_canvas canoes.png

By 1881 the standard options for a canoe at Moosehead Lake, were one “made of birch bark or canvas, painted" These canvas canoes became so common at the Lake that some sources describe the canoe Gerrish sent to the New Orleans in 1884 as “a canvass canoe such as is used at Moosehead Lake.” An article originally published in the New York Sun in 1885, which was picked up by several national periodicals and newspapers (see Dan’s Post #51) acknowledged that “many cloth canoes” had been built over the previous ten years, and that when painted they were watertight, and "lighter, and just as cheap as the birch,” but insisted "birch would never be displace by canvas [because] it bends in prettier forms."
1889_Hubbards_Gerrish Canvas Canoe ad.png
A couple of years later a reworked version of this article appeared as a letter, but now claimed "a great many [canvas canoes} were being built at Bangor,” and that in addition to bending in prettier forms than canvas, bark was also "a more romantic material.” Various versions of this article also circulated among national publications. One of the latest versions in the Lawrence Daily Journal (Kansas) from August 1888 was titled Birch Bark Canoes, but nonetheless began, “Birch and canvas canoes are greatly increasing in popularity [and …] at most of the summer resorts they supersede all other craft that have to be propelled by hand,” and later reports that “Several years ago canvas began to be used extensively in canoe-building” and that there were ”several canvas canoe factories in Maine, but the canoes made of canvas have neither the symmetry nor the durability of the birches” and that “if pleasure and profit are wanted one should never have any thing but a bark craft.” Even as the canvas canoes continued to displace the birch in the Maine tourist industry, its advocates still took solace in the belief that canvas “[would] never entirely supersede the birch.”
1888_Birch Bark Canoes_The Evening _July_14_Bich Bak CanoesTribune_Lawrence Kansas.png
But as the national press debated the future of the Birch, the local newspapers made it clear that the unimaginable was already happening, and the 1889 edition of Lucius Hubbard’s Guide to Moosehead Lake described a similar state of affairs in a paragraph he added to the lengthy section on birch-bark canoes that appeared in all previous editions.

1888_Republican Journal, Belfast, Maine, August 2,1888, p. 2.png1889_Hubbard_Guide to Moosehead Lake p.16_canvas canoes.png

Gerrish also published his first display in this edition of Hubbard’s Guidebook to Moosehead Lake, in which he declared that, “The canvas-covered canoe has entirely superseded the birch.” Although he was likely building solid planked wood canvas canoes by then, it was his original Maine canvas canoe, that had accomplished this difficult task, and completed the first milestone in the history of Maine’s canvas canoes.
1889_Hubbards_Gerrish Canvas Canoe ad.png
But the original Maine canvas canoes were very much a Maine thing, and even though by 1881 Gerrish had been listed in The New England Business Directory, the Maine State Year Book, and the Bangor City Directory, most of his orders came form sportsmen and tourists who had direct experience with his canoes in Maine.

1886_Industrial Journal_2 April 1886_p.1.png

Consequently, demand was limited, and although Gerrish was the most prolific builder at this time, he made only 30 canoes in 1885, and despite the claim he would build over seventy canoes in 1886, later sources report he only made 60 in 1888. But demand was not the only problem; the building method of the original canvas canoes did not lend itself to large scale production. The solid planked shell and eventual adoption of canoe forms in wood-canvas canoe construction would solve this problem, and by 1890 both Gerrish and Morris were confident enough to enter the national market place, and published their first ads in Forest and Stream. At the time the only canvas canoes available in the national market place were the very popular portable folding canvas boats, and part of appeal of the original canvas canoes was that they had allowed the local canoe building industry to ward off this outside competition in Maine. The wood canvas canoe would quickly surpass the original canvas canoes in Maine between 1887-1889, and then compete directly with the portable folding canvas boats in the national market place, eventually surpassing them, and becoming, arguably, the most popular type of canoe in the country. So the history of canvas canoes in Maine is best thought of as consisting of two distinct phases; (1) the original canvas canoe's displacement of the bark canoes as the dominant canoe in the Maine tourist industry between 1875 and 1889, and (2) the wood-canvas canoe’s subsequent displacement of the portable folding canvas canoes (and for many the all-wood canoes) as the dominant canoe in the national marketplace between 1890 and about 1920.
 
Howard, this is fantastic stuff. What are we saying here exactly? Canvas canoes weren’t built over a form until the late 1880’s-1890????
 
Thanks for all that research, Howard.

I see that you are saying canvas canoes superseded birch canoes and folding canvas canoes. And that some of the builders were actually building solid wood canoes, presumably dubbing copper nails.
For me, all this begs the question of where the specialized "canoe tack" came from, and when?
The D. B. Gurney (est'd 1825) website provides some leads; https://dbgurney.com/pages/about-us
And a stunning array of sizes (actually, weights); https://dbgurney.com/collections/canoe-boat-builders
 
all this begs the question of where the specialized "canoe tack" came from, and when?

I have wondered about this as an avenue for research. Cobblers and others have been using a variety of clenched tacks for a long time. It may be difficult to distinguish canoe tacks from similar tacks used for other purposes.

Benson
 
Howard,

Great post, a ton of info to digest. I have been digging a ton lately and can certainly add. Possible to share where Morris claims to have started building on a form?

The timeframe you suggest is about what I have been finding as well. I have been privately conversing with Chris and Benson when I find something that I find exciting. Just last night I was showing Chris some articles about Gerrish. In particular the width of canvas dated 1885 that suggested a seam was placed down the middle of the canoe at that time, as a 5' width not being available. That said, I hinted as his, oldest know Gerrish being made after that time period as we believe it has original canvas on it and unseamed. Also, the earliest were painted bark in color. Of the dozens I am aware, none are this shade.

I have found many of the same articles you have posted and more. This one dated SEP 26, 1884 from The Mining and Industrial Journal. We have to remember that this work was largely seasonal at the time. 30 canoes sold since March. Only a 6-month time span. The word season could be confused with yearly numbers.

Gerrish was guiding during hunting seasons and prime fishing season for what I am finding in other articles. One could say he was more of an outfitter at this time as he was making the only bamboo and solid wood fish rods in the Bangor area, canoes and are hosting sports at his sporting lodges either on B Pond or Onawa Lake. He stayed for months on end many winters hunting. There were not set seasons such as today.

1749688211350.png


This next article falls right in line with your long post above. Certainly, bark like construction with the minimal tools involved. From the Industrial Journal, May 15, 1885.
1749688406974.png


Gerrish was by far the most prolific builder of the times. He was the first to introduce canvas canoes to the Charles River in 1889 per the next article. I could not find anything before this canvas canoe article on Partelow who was in business many years before 1889 but were building Rob Roy style canoes. C.P Nutting would be the first to produce canvas canoes to the Charles per another article I have located. Robertson followed just after.

1749689428171.png


The first I have been able to locate copper fastened canoes is dated 1890 and is shared below. Assumingly, built on a form at this point. The word I have found that was used in that time period is a model. I have searched it extensively and have come up short with additional info. As I've said in the past the exciting news (In papers) was placing canvas on canoes as a technological achievement.
1749690348135.png


I have yet to nail down much solid info but the second largest builder of canvas canoes that has not been mentioned yet in this discussion is Carleton. Guy was building a high volume of bark canoes during the early Gerrish years. I just located an article from 1883 stating he was getting ready to manufacture canvas canoes shortly. Hubbard was using is Bark canoes in many expeditions. I have not uncovered any advancements in construction from Guy, but he was on the up and up until he passed away in, I believe 1902. We know the rest of the Carleton story. The articles I have uncovered on his company are very seasonal. Over the winter of 1892 he was expecting to manufacture 100 Canvas canoes for instance. For many consecutive years he built large volumes of canoes over the winter and sold throughout the following year.

Some credit needs to be given to Mr. John Darling as well here in the earliest stages on canvas canoes. He lived upriver of Bangor and built canvas/bark canoes. I have uncovered numerous articles with his name. Below is an example.
1749691888848.png

George Patrick of Greenville, Maine was involved for only a short period in canoes. He passed at a young age in 1889 in Greenville.

I have also found that MANY of the earlier canoes sold were destined for Moosehead Lake. It was a premier destination at the time with the Grand Hotel on Kineo. Bangor was a train stop along the way from the south and gear was purchased for the journey northward. The journey consisted of a train continuance and wagon ride to Greenville. Hop abord the steamer to Kineo. The trip could be over and relax on the beautiful peninsula and fish the lake. A canoe trip was continued in chosen by steamer to Northeast Carry where the West branch of the Penobscot River could be taken back to Bangor, about a 10-day journey. If a longer trip was in order, the Allagash River was taken to the St. John's River and onward to a Southeast direction toward civilization. Most of the trips I am reading about were the West Branch excursions.

Zack
 
I have wondered about this as an avenue for research. Cobblers and others have been using a variety of clenched tacks for a long time. It may be difficult to distinguish canoe tacks from similar tacks used for other purposes.

Benson
Many of the 1890's canoes I have restored or researched have larger than today's tack size. Some have been what I would call a small copper nail. I may have a photo or two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MGC
With respect to the seam on the canvas. Baker Custom canoes of Michigan always had a seam under the keel. I recanvassed a canoe that Brian covered in 1996. After 20 plus years, no leaks and no evidence it was seamed until I took it apart. Brian told me that his method was easier to apply using a seam.
 
I have yet to nail down much solid info but the second largest builder of canvas canoes that has not been mentioned yet in this discussion is Carleton.

Guy Carleton was first listed as a canoe builder in the 1883 edition of the Maine Register. The video at the first link below has more about him from a presentation at the Assembly a few years ago. His grave at the second link shows lists his dates as 1850 to 1902. The thread at the third link has more details about his involvement with bark canoes.









Some credit needs to be given to Mr. John Darling as well here in the earliest stages on canvas canoes.

Message numbers 51 and 52 in this thread has more about Jonathan "Jock" Darling.


This is some great research. Keep up the good work,

Benson

 
Thanks for all that research, Howard.

I see that you are saying canvas canoes superseded birch canoes and folding canvas canoes. And that some of the builders were actually building solid wood canoes, presumably dubbing copper nails.
For me, all this begs the question of where the specialized "canoe tack" came from, and when?
The D. B. Gurney (est'd 1825) website provides some leads; https://dbgurney.com/pages/about-us
And a stunning array of sizes (actually, weights); https://dbgurney.com/collections/canoe-boat-builders
Rob,
I think this is going to be a tough one to nail down :) . These are original "tacks" removed for the very early White that will be at this year's assembly and finishing currently. As you can see, the tacks are questionable if they are tacks or not. Certainly, different form the tacks I've purchased and have on hand from Gurney. I'd date these copper fasteners from 1890-1895 from the White. Similar to other earlier canoes I have restored over the years that I'd date before 1900.
Zack
 

Attachments

  • tack1.jpg
    tack1.jpg
    118.3 KB · Views: 50
  • tack2.jpg
    tack2.jpg
    134.9 KB · Views: 51
Rob, Zack
I don’t have anything to add in the way of knowledge about the history of tacks, but I thought you might be interested in the tacks that were originally used in my Morris Special Indian Model, which can be confidently dated 1896-99. I don’t know if they copper. Many of them had come loose and the canvas was holding the whole thing together. All the tacks had to be replaced. Some features suggest the canoe may be one of Morris’s Second Grade canoes, but I don’t know this would effect what kind of tacks he used. Also some nails taken from other parts of the canoe.

.Tacks_Nails_Morris_1896-99_Special Indian.png
 
Last edited:
I've just removed these (top four) from my Strickland (cedar strip), so 1894-1905. The nails are copper, round, 1.3mm or 0.51", 16 AWG, presumably 3/4" before being cut and bent 90 degrees. The smaller tacks are copper and flat and held the quarter round oak trim between the coaming and the inwale. They don't seem strong enough to penetrate but the trim went all round, tacked every 3 inches.

The bottom two are what I used as replacement.
IMG_4577.jpg
 
Howard, this is fantastic stuff. What are we saying here exactly? Canvas canoes weren’t built over a form until the late 1880’s-1890????

Chris, Evidence suggests that the Maine builders did not start building solid-planked hulls until 1887, but Morris did not provide any information about how he built his earliest solid-planked shells, so we should not assume they were built on canoe forms. He focused on the fundamental change to stretching canvas over a solid planked hull, instead of putting loose ribs and planking into the canvas as the critical point. Although, this was a "radical change” for the Maine builders, amateur canoe builders throughout the country had been building canvas-on-frame cruising canoes for over a decade, and they had become the most popular canvas canoes in the U. S. even though they were not on the market. As the editors of Forest and Stream confirmed in 1883, “The canvas boats in this country are usually built with a rigid wooden frame covered with canvas, and such boats have proved strong and durable, while they are readily built by amateurs.” This tradition began in 1876 when Issac F. West built a canvas-on-frame version of the Baltic Rob Roy, which he called the Qui Vive canoe. His main goal was to create a cheaper version of an all-wood cruising canoe, and he claimed that, “Any one with correct eye, and a little skill with tools can build a 'Qui Vive' canoe.”
Canvas Canoes Lake George CampHarper's new monthly magazine v.61 June-Nov.1880.png
The above sketch shows four canvas cruising canoes (the ones in the middle of the group) and is from The Cruising Canoe and Its Outfit, by Charles E. Chase in the Harper’s New Monthly Magazine, August, 1880.

Since the overriding goal of the tradition was to encourage others to build their own canvas canoe, the amateur builders left a unique body of instructional literature focused specifically on how to build a canvas-on-frame cruising canoe. Although most of these were modeled after the Rob Roy or other all-wood models, there are some examples built after the model of the birch bark canoes. These plans and building instructions were found in books, periodicals and newspapers, and were widely distributed throughout the country. Although the traditional canvas-on-frame canoes were not fully planked, they did have several longitudinal strips that were firmly attached to the sides of the canoe, so the transition from these open frames to a fully planked hull would have been both conceptually and practically, simple. So not surprisingly, examples of solid-planked hulls began showing up in the literature by 1884, so it seems quite likely that Morris “adopted” his “method of the solid-planked shell” from these canvas-on-frame cruising canoes and their associated instructional literature.

The instructional literature includes detailed information on the techniques, materials, and tools used to build a canvas-on-frame canoe, which may help us shed light on what tools and materials may have been used by the more taciturn Maine builders. I have attached a few examples from this literature, but they are just a drop in a bucket that contains a treasure trove of information.

Attachment 1 :
How to Build a Canvas Canoe (W. P. Stephens, 1880) W. P. Stephens was an early advocate of the canvas-on-frame cruising canoes and built his first one in 1877. He sold the two canvas canoes described here in his 1880 catalog at $30 and $45 complete with sail and rigging. The wooden Rob Roy cost $90 complete. Canvas canoes do not appear in later catalogs. His designs here use molds (cross sections) instead of ribs, but plans and instruction for a smaller paddling canvas canoe in Harpers’s Young Reader in 1880 and the canvas canoe described in his book Canoe and Boat Building use rib construction. He also provided the plans for the two canvas canoes described by Webb in his 1898 book Manual of the Canvas Canoe Its Construction, which again used molds instead of ribs.

A Light Paddling Canoe (Charles E. Chase, 1880) Chase was another early advocate who also published more detailed building instructions in an article entitled "A Low-Priced Canoe" in Forest and Stream in 1879.

Attachment 2:
Practical Boat Building for Amateurs (Adrian Neison, 1881). An early example of canvas-on-frame canoe modeled after a birch bark canoe.

Attachment 3:
A Boys Home Made Canoe (Penn,1884) No detailed instructions on how to build these canvas boats, and the author even dissuades the reader from using them, but he captures the essence of the method. Penn reported that some Maine guides were using them which is possible, but he also may have been confusing them with Gerrish’s original canvas canoes, since they were essentially unknown outside of Maine at this time. But amateur builders, including West, used their canvas-on-frame canoes for hunting and fishing and use in rough water.

This is the article referenced by Stephens in Canoe and Boat Building: A Complete Manual for the Amateur

“Another method of building a canvas boat, as described by a writer in Forest and Stream, was to build the boat, of whatever model desired, in the same manner as an ordinary carvel built wooden boat, but using very thin planking, no attempt being made to have the seams in the latter watertight. This frame is then covered with canvas laid in thick paint, causing it to adhere to the wood, and making a smooth, watertight surface. Such a boat can be easily built by those who have not the skill and training necessary to build a wooden boat, and it would be strong and durable, as well as cheap.”

Attachment 4:
A Canvas Canoe (B. T. Newman, 1884) This is the earliest appearance of a fully-planked hull in the amateur canvas-on-frame literature.

Attachment 5
A Canvas Canoe (H. C. Hartingh, 1887) Describes a canvas-on-frame boat built in 1881 based on Stephens’s 1880 instructions, but with some changes, including fully planking the bottom to 3-inches above the water line.

Attachment 6:
How to Build a Canvas Canoe (Percy M. Adams, 1887) A completely planked shell modeled after the Birch Bark.

Attachment 7:
Indigenous Planked Canvas Canoe. The canvas-on-frame canoes were built upright, as were the bark canoes, and the original Maine canvas canoes. This technique would have been familiar to Morris, so he likely initially built his solid planked shells using the basic methods desribed in the literature. As shown here this method was used by some indigenous canoe building communities well into the twentieth century. Original Maine canvas canoe construction was also seen much later in these communities, and like may them this example may also be a vestige of an earlier stage of Maine canvas canoe building.

Attachment 8:
A nice summary of the methods for building a canvas canoe from 1900 in Woodworking for Beginners

So evidence indicates that by 1887 the amateur builders of canvas-on-frame cruising canoes had already recognized that the best way to build a canvas canoe was by stretching canvas over a solid frame, and had expanded that principle by introducing solid planked hulls, and that Morris had indeed “adopted” his “method of the solid plank shell” from that tradition..

Of course the obvious question is, “When did Morris and other Maine builders start building solid planked canvas canoes on forms, and what influenced their decision to do so?" The short answer is we don’t know. But there are some interesting bits and pieces, which may help us begin formulating a plausible narrative. I will share some findings and thoughts on this topic in a separate post.
 

Attachments

This tradition began in 1876 when Issac F. West built a canvas-on-frame version of the Baltic Rob Roy, which he called the Qui Vive canoe.

The information in response number 27 of this thread indicates that canvas-on-frame canoes may have been first built in the 1830s. We just don't have much detail about how these "canvas canoes" were made or what they looked like.

Benson
 
Last edited:
The reference in #3 to "seams" and 'carvel boats" makes me think he is describing a wood canvas canoe rather than a skin on frame. That would suggest that by 1884, someone had built a wood canvas boat of the style we now have. He says nothing of a building mold. N G Herreshoff built production small boats over inverted skeleton molds, possibly in the same era. I would have to search my library and other sources to see if I can find when he started that.
 
Benson, I am well aware that the canvas-on-frame canoes appear much earlier, but my point was not that the Qui Vive was the first canvas-on-frame cruising canoe, but that it was the spark that ignited the amateur canvas-on-frame canoe building tradition that flourished during the last two decade of the nineteenth century.

John, You are correct that the author of Attachment 3 is arguing for building canvas boats and canoes by simply building a light weight carvel boat and cover it in canvas and Attachments 3-5 show that canvas canoes with planked hulls were being built by 1884. I have avoided the term “wood-canvas canoe” only because many use this term for canvas canoes built on canoe forms and closely modeled after the birch bark canoes, so I refer to them as solid planked canvas canoes.

My comments about canvas-on-frame canoes refer to the authors brief comments about them in Attachment 3.

From A Boys Home Made Canoe  FS v.23 p93.png

I will post information I have found about “keel up” construction methods and skeletal molds. It wood be interesting to hear more about N. G. Herreshoff.
 
Nathaniel Greene Herreshoff has legendary status in classic yachts. I think he designed and built 5 America's Cup defenders, and hundreds of other boats and yachts. I don't know that he ever built or designed a canoe, though his son L Francis Herreshoff designed what he called a "decked double paddle canoe". We would call it a kayak. There are books on both designers and probably numerous articles. There is a Herreshoff Museum in South Bristol RI where the old yard was located, it's very worth visiting.
 
Unfortunately, there is very little information to help us better understand how and when the Maine builders started using forms to construct their solid planked hulls. The transition likely occurred sometime between 1887 and 1900. Although we are a long way from knowing how this happened, I thought it might be helpful to summarize a few things we do know.

Herald received Canadian patent #1252 in 1871 for his “Boat and Canoe Mould” and extended it with patent #6877 in 1876 under a new title, “Machine for Turning the Points of Nails.” [Attachment 1871-Heralds Original Patent] The “canoe mould” was very similar to the modern canoe forms eventually used in the wood-canvas canoe industry and included metal strips to clinch the nails. The problem is that although the Herald Canoes were well known, apart from these patents the canoe moulds do not show up in the canoeing literature of the period, and there is no evidence suggesting Morris or any other Maine canoe builders knew anything about them.

The Canadian Canoe Company, which started in 1892, was using fully developed canoe molds for all-wood canoes in the 1890s as seen in the photo of page 132 of Canoes, a National History in North America, by Mark Neuzil and Norman Sims. Herald’s Canoe Mould is the likely source for this Canadian Company but again there is no evidence that Morris or other Maine builders were familiar with these methods.

During the 1880s other kinds of canoe forms did begin showing up in the popular boat building literature. In 1884 in Forest and Stream W. P. Stephens, who paid great attention to canoe and boat building methods, described an alternative to the traditional “stocks”used for building canoes upright (Fig. 9), which he elsewhere referred to as “planking mould.” (Figs. 10,13) shows the table for a planking mold and a canoe set up in a planking mold.

Amateur Canoe Building_Seventh Planking Mould_Paper_Forest & Stream, 21 February 1884-p77..png
Figures_Amateur Canoe Building_Seventh Paper_Forest & Stream, 21 February 1884-p77..png
Figures_Amateur Canoe Building_Eighth Paper_Forest & Stream, 28 February 1884_p97.png

Stephens likely referred to it as “planking mould” because it was used exclusively for applying the planking of whatever type to stems and keel and, temporary, to the moulds. Once the planking was completed, the moulds were detached from the table and the canoe and moulds were turned upright and put in standard stocks, at which time the ribs were put in and then moulds removed!

Eventually a canoe mould was described in Forest and Stream in late 1887, first used by amateur builder in Albany, H. Piepenbrink, to build smoothskin canoes using the “ribband carvel” method (here referred to as ribbon carvel).
1887_FS_Smoothskin Canoes_p414.png

W. P. Stephens commented on this method in Forest and Stream in 1888, and believed it impractical for an amateur builder and preferred the method described above. (The Albany builder were amateur builders but seemed to build several canoes on similar models)
1888_Canoe Building and Fit_FS_22 March 1888_p 176_ Whepnes.png
Morris described how he made his canvas boats in some detail in his 1893 catalog, and claimed elsewhere in the catalog that his Indian Canoes were made in a similar manner. He mentions the smoothskins specifically and describes what seems to be be the use of a form. The forms described for the Albany canoes could have been easily adapted by simply reshaping the moulds and eliminating the ribbands.

1752518335843.png

But the forms used by the Albany builders were open forms that did not include metal strips for “the turning of nails,” since screws were used to attach planking and ribs. The use of tacks or nails on such a form would have required clinching after removal of the hull from the canoe mold. The photos in the Attachment 1914_Radford’s Manual give some sense of what the use of these open forms would have looked like. Morris’s description of the clinching process is ambiguous, but may describe a separate clinching process.

I realize that this information highlights our ignorance by introduced a number of new questions that we cannot answer.

Were solid planked shells and canoe forms adopted at the same time?
Were modern closed canoe forms adopted all at once, or were they preceded by open canoe forms?
What factors inspired these changes, and when did they likely to occur?


Although, we still do not know enough to provide definitive answers for any of these questions, we at least know that there are several possibilities. I think it is valuable consolidate what little information that we do have, and would be very interested to see of any other pertinent information others may have found regarding the use of canoe forms in the 1880s and 1890s..

On a side note. During the twentieth century there were increasing numbers of how to build wood-canvas canoes using home made forms I have attached an example for those who might be interested, 1918_Rudder_How to Build a Canvas Covered Canoe.
 

Attachments

The American Canoe Association met at Stony Lake Ontario in 1883, and J. R. Robertson had relatives that were in Peterborough for various canoe companies. So , I do not believe that the idea there was no transfer of ideas and information has merit.
 
The American Canoe Association met at Stony Lake Ontario in 1883, and J. R. Robertson had relatives that were in Peterborough for various canoe companies. So , I do not believe that the idea there was no transfer of ideas and information has merit.
Hi Dan,
My point was that if you look at sources you do not find references to Herald’s “Canoe Mould” or “Machine for the turning of Nails,” or descriptions or references to his method, but nowhere do I conclude that there was no direct transfer of knowledge from Herald’s method to the Maine builder or that it could not have happened, only that we do not see it in the sources. In fact, my only real conclusion was that, "we still do not know enough to provide definitive answers for any of these questions” about how the Maine builders came to the use of forms, and that there was more than one possibility. And the thought that it would be helpful to get all the pertinent information we do have, such as the J. R. Robertson connection, gathered in a single place.
 
Having worked in the field of inventive design, and also having been deeply involved in patents, patent research, infringement cases, writing and pursuit of patents and having watched my son both invent and then protect a concept, it is my opinion that in the spirit of solving a technical challenge, that the actual process of invention is generally quite organic. I did, and we did often set out to find solutions/concepts that were developed around specific awareness of existing filings and approved patents, but that was not a deliberate strategy except in a few very specific robotics problems. In the heat of true engineering development, it was generally a case of you against a problem.
With my limited knowledge of US canoe builders (Maine or otherwise) I would expect that their process of innovation had nothing to do with Canadian prior art. The spate of canoe related patents in Canada in many ways reminds me of similar Japanese actions to patent industry innovation with the idea that owning rights to particular technology would give an IP advantage. I seriously doubt that a Bert Morris or Evan Gerrish was paying a whole lot of attention to filings. Having been there, I think it becomes quite simple. You have hundreds of nails that need to be turned. Doing them one at a time is a miserable job, getting your wife to hang on to the iron for you is not ideal, how could you do this job best, by yourself? There are not a ton of good solutions to that problem. A smart and creative person will figure it out. No research or articles, only my opinion, but I have seen it happen and I have been part of it. What I have also seen is that the same problem can be solved by different people in different places at more or less the same time because when push comes to shove, most of the best solutions become somewhat obvious when you decide to solve them. FWIW.
 
Back
Top