When were bark canoes first made in the northeastern part of North America?

Benson Gray

Canoe History Enthusiast
Staff member
David Cook who wrote Above the Gravel Bar gave a lecture recently and I was able to speak with him at some length after it was over. We happened to get on the topic of when bark canoes were first introduced. He feels strongly that the commonly cited 2,500 years ago estimate is not old enough. (See https://www.abbemuseum.org/blog/2013/08/birchbark-canoe-build-at-abbe-museum.html and https://www.maine.gov/mhpc/programs/education/prehistoric-archaeology along with other sources for more on this topic.) His argument is based on the proven older human presence in remote upland places like Milo, Maine which would not have been easily accessible with dugout canoes. Does anyone else have any thoughts or data on this topic? Thanks,

Benson
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MGC
The oldest temples on Malta, in the Mediterranean, are about 5,500 years old, which predates the oldest known evidence for sails, so canoes must have been used to get there. I don't know if that is relevant but, if people have been in North America for 12,000 years, the mental ability could have been there. Were there stone tools in North America from earlier than 2,500 years ago? Presumably they were necessary. The earliest known canoe, a dugout from the Netherlands, is about 10,000 years old.

Charlie.
 
The history of bark canoes includes the advent of necessary tools and the skills to build such complex craft. Early people in the Americas made some sophisticated tools including things like Clovis and Folsom points, so they were skilled. Even so, while bark canoes could predate the 2500 ya mark, it is unclear how the human occupation of what it now Milo, Maine provides any evidence of the age of bark canoe development. The core of the argument above seems to be that people got to the Milo area before 2500 years ago and bark canoes were the only way to get there, so bark canoes must have been around more than 2500 years ago. But he notion that "remote upland places like Milo"may not have been easily accessible with dugouts doesn't mean that bark canoes, other boats, or even water travel at all had anything to do with the area's prehistoric settlement. Milo sits only 100m above sea level, and people could have accessed that area on foot, through the use of animals, etc.

There are plenty of prehistoric human-occupied places with far more difficult access and places occupied much longer ago. In the Andes, more than 100 prehistoric human occupation sites are known above 5000m, with some elevations approaching even 7000m. The Nwya Devu site in central Tibet sits at 4600m, and it was occupied some 30,000-40,000 years ago. The extensive Andean culture grew to interact over great distances using an extensive network of roads despite much of the region being very high, very dry, and very cold, just like on the Tibetan plateau. The Andes and the Tibetan plateau, as examples, surely were far less accessible than what is now central Maine, which during its human prehistory was much wetter and warmer, and was far lower in altitude. If the concern is that water may have prevented access without boats of some kind, this document:


indicates that between 8000 and 5000 years ago, what is now Maine was drier, lake levels were lower, and river flows were probably considerably less, so people may have had had even more access then. Dating bark canoe technology is very interesting, but why assume canoes were the limiting factor for human access to the area during its prehistory?
 
Last edited:
Wabanaki use of Kineo Rhyolite should be taken into consideration when discussing the region. Incredibly vast land and water routes supported its access and trade for many thousands of years. Bark craft may have played a later role in this but clearly bark craft did not lead to its trade. The wide use and trade of Kineo "flint" goes back far beyond bark boats.
Side bar.....Milo ain't so bad. On our frequent trips to Millinocket, my mother always complained that we had reached the end of civilization when we passed Katahdin Iron Works enroute. Milo had stores.
 
Clearly people thousands of years ago could have walked to the Milo, Maine area and other remote regions. However, Bruce Bourque's book The Swordfish Hunters: The History and Ecology of an Ancient American Sea People and other sources confirm that people have been using some type of boat to hunt deep water fish off the coast of Maine for several thousand years. It seems likely that they were also using smaller boats to explore the inland waterways. None of these craft have survived so we don't know if they were dugouts, bark canoes, skin on frame boats, all of these, or something else.

The common theory is that bark canoes were introduced about 2,500 years ago because the known stone tools changed significantly around that time. It has also been pointed out that they were making shelters, fish weirs, weapons, and many other things out of wood so the stone tool changes could have been for many reasons other than canoe building. The 2009 article titled "Birchbark Canoes, Dugouts, and Gouges: Is There Any Logical Relationship?" by David Sanger from the The Maine Archaeological Society Bulletin 49:2 on pages 17-34 offers some perspective on this topic. It is available at the link below. So many questions,

Benson


 
Last edited:
John McPhee wrote "The Survival of the Bark Canoe". It has been a while since I read it but as I remember it contained a history, at least as it related to pre-Columbian North American Birch forests and the indigenous people.
It also describes a modern Birch Bark Canoe being built in the traditional way. I recommend it.
 
North American Birch forests

The top of page 17 in my copy says "The range of the tree - Betula papyrifera , variously called the white birch , the silver birch , the paper birch , the canoe birch - forms a swath more than a thousand miles wide (more or less from New York City to Hudson Bay) and reaches westward and northwestward to the Pacific." I didn't find anything about when the first bark canoe might have been made. Please let me know if anyone else knows where this might be located. Thanks,

Benson
 
Here's an image of the range of the paper birch, from Neuzil and Sims' book, "Canoes: A Natural History in North America";
John Jennings, in his, "The Canoe; A Living Tradition" notes this "necklace" corresponds to the glaciated area to the south and west of the (geological) Canadian Shield containing vast numbers of lakes and rivers.
 
Back
Top