I noted several discussions on the topic and the associated obviously very knowledgeable replies, but I'm still not clear.
The canoe I'm working on has been dry as a bone for years and creaks and cracks and pops when you beathe on it.
Dan M suggested using thinned varnish on the inside, followed by less thinned coats. I assume this extra penetrating action will get varnish deeper into the wood and make it stiffer, but the already dry wood's pretty brittle to start with.
Now, I DO want to varnish first (that makes sense to me), but would a less-penetrating application be better from the point of view that after the interior is sealed, a good soaking of oil to the exterior would bring back some "springiness" to the wood? Do I even want that?
If I do, it seems to me that the exterior oil won't be penetrating too deeply as the varnish, however much thinned, will have pretty much sealed the wood to keep out anything, including the possibly beneficial oil.
The canoe I'm working on has been dry as a bone for years and creaks and cracks and pops when you beathe on it.
Dan M suggested using thinned varnish on the inside, followed by less thinned coats. I assume this extra penetrating action will get varnish deeper into the wood and make it stiffer, but the already dry wood's pretty brittle to start with.
Now, I DO want to varnish first (that makes sense to me), but would a less-penetrating application be better from the point of view that after the interior is sealed, a good soaking of oil to the exterior would bring back some "springiness" to the wood? Do I even want that?
If I do, it seems to me that the exterior oil won't be penetrating too deeply as the varnish, however much thinned, will have pretty much sealed the wood to keep out anything, including the possibly beneficial oil.