Chestnut Cruiser 16'

Very nice ! it appears to be a dead ringer for my early cruiser.
Yes Graham, that's exactly what I thought, when I saw the photos in your post from 2013. They could be sisters.
Does yours still have the original canvas on, and therefore you did not check for the stem top detail?


Obviously your boat has been repaired and re-canvassed at some point. If you remove the canvas and planking in that area, perhaps check to see if there is any evidence that the stem was altered.
To me all planks seem to be original. But maybe after so many years, you can't tell.
Don't know, if I want to remove the sheer plank only for this check.
I also don't know, if it was re-canvassed. There was a repair done with glass/resin on one end.
Like the glass was glued on the canvas. Maybe to cover a crack in the canvas...

So, is the stem detail the killer criteria for pre/postfire?
I understood, that it was seen on all known prefire boats when the canvas was off.
But is the new stem design technically linked to the change of the forms?
Or could it have been introduced by the boat builder independent from the new forms?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240322_170845.jpg
    IMG_20240322_170845.jpg
    153 KB · Views: 42
Meanwhile I had a look a the number of holes from the tacks at the stems and for sure this boat was canvassed only one time.
So planks and stem must be original.

I also found this writing on one plank.
Or the boat builder signed this boat personally or (more likely) he just tried out his pencil.

Note the tacks between the planks.

IMG_20240322_170945.jpg
 
Back
Top